← Search

Shirley Hunter-Welch

— year-end
52 matches · 25W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Shirley Hunter-Welch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-28 · LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForest · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lilly Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-21 · LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForest · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kimberly Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-07 · LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForest · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lilly Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · LCTA55/McElhiney/PineForest · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-28 · LCTA55/Holder/Pine Forest · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-14 · LCTA55/Holder/Pine Forest · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Lee Anne Stone / Jennifer Smith
2026-03-08 · LCTA55/Holder/Pine Forest · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Grund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-12-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Libby Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
51.1%
24W–23L · 48.5% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.9% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova