← Search

Elizabeth Kobak

Old Westbury, NY
5.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
15 matches · 6W–9L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Elizabeth Kobak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2024-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Nick Charlton-Perrin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Andre Gagnon / Jennifer Ptak
2024-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with John Mysz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-06-22 · Gerger/Torres · #1 Doubles · with Amelie Ekdahl Bozkir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-6
L
2021-07-11 · Carefree, Einhorn · #2 Doubles · with Deirdre Ettus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-05-13 · Carefree, Einhorn · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-12-11 · Garfield/Lieb · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Mark Schlecker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7
W
2019-11-14 · Garfield/Lieb · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Mark Schlecker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2019-10-22 · Garfield/Lieb · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Mark Schlecker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Elena Bantovska / Aibika Sperl
2019-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elizabeth Haney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2019-06-27 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kelly Brown-Cobbs
2019-06-26 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Meredith Steigman / Lauren Sussman
2019-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elizabeth Kallenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
5.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.8% of games
10.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#1 Singles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer