← Search

Eric Chaffer

Long Beach, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 68W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Chaffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Carefree, Chesney/Perri · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Kolenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with James Carpenter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Keith Lopez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with James Carpenter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Carefree, McAuliffe/Jones · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan McAuliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Carefree, Chesney/Perri · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Kolenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Carefree, Chesney/Perri · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Chesney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · LI:Carefree, Perri/Kolenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Dwek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · Carefree, Chesney/Perri · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Chesney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-24 · Carefree, McAuliffe/Jones · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Chesney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Carefree, Chesney/Perri · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Chesney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Carefree, McAuliffe/Jones · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan McAuliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
80.4%
37W–9L · 59.8% of games
9.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.5% of games
9.0mixed
51.2%
21W–20L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova