← Search

David Ha

Tenafly, NJ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 22W–9L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add David Ha to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-07-06 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Belmonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siva Kakaraparthi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-15 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaroslaw Chorazykiewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaroslaw Chorazykiewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-12-14 · No Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-11-16 · No Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-03-02 · NJ: WTF Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Allievi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-02-24 · NJ: WTF Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Zimmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-02-17 · Team Ferrante · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edina Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-27 · NJ: WTF Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marijus Kuzavas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-01-20 · NJ: WTF Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marijus Kuzavas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-11-19 · No Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marijus Kuzavas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal