← Search

Alicia Sikes

Quakertown, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 113W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alicia Sikes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
W
Emily Clark
2026-08-16 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bernabeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanne Milburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bernabeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · UMLY 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Krane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
W
2026-07-15 · UMLY 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Krane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · No Love Lost · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · Smashing Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wai Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · No Love Lost · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-6
W
2026-06-06 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Smashing Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wai Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 29.2% of games
4.0
51.3%
78W–74L · 51.1% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 39.8% of games
8.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#1 Singles
13%
28 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova