← Search

Patricia Keleman

Bethlehem, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
317 matches · 246W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Keleman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history317 matches
L
2026-09-05 · Grit & Grace · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · Grit & Grace · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · Grit & Grace · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · Grit & Grace · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
W
2026-07-11 · Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Deflavis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · Smash and Dash · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · Force Fields · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · Golden Girls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · Smash and Dash · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Force Fields · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Matthew Paat / Sarah Albaugh
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · with Brett Siegfried championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Hudak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
87.5%
91W–13L · 74.3% of games
4.0
82.4%
42W–9L · 67.1% of games
4.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 57.6% of games
7.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 61% of games
8.0
70.2%
40W–17L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
104 matches
#1 Female Singles
18%
58 matches
#1 Female Doubles
14%
45 matches
#1 Singles
14%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert