← Search

Jason Clements

Boise, ID
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
69 matches · 50W–19L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Jason Clements to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-04-29 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Jewett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Power Hitters · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Newby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · Racqueteers 40s · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Karlfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Jewett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-01 · Racqueteers 40s · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Karlfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Malecha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
69.2%
27W–12L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.1% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams