← Search

Nancy Hicks

— year-end
69 matches · 22W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Nancy Hicks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-05-09 · Shahadi 7.0W/TTC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alyson Langholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · Singleton/LF 65s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Eagleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Shahadi 7.0W/TTC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Zetik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-11 · Shahadi 7.0W/TTC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-29 · Singleton/LF 65s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · Singleton/LF 65s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Shahadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-03 · Langholz/TTC/3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Shahadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-23 · Langholz/TTC/3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Shahadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-10-08 · Langholz/TTC/3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-07 · Schroedter/TTC/DAY 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alyson Langholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-25 · Langholz/TTC/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-16 · Schroedter/TTC/DAY 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Shahadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
44%
11W–14L · 47.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–11L · 33.2% of games
7.0
36%
9W–16L · 44.3% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert