← Search

Tiffany Steinke

— year-end
225 matches · 133W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tiffany Steinke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · Edgar/LF/Day3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharna Bovasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Darby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Zahidah Hyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Zahidah Hyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · Freed/PH 18s 8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Baylor Spring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · Freed/PH 18s 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Baylor Spring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-05 · Steinke/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
Teams60 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
55%
11W–9L · 48.4% of games
3.5
63.9%
78W–44L · 55.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.5% of games
7.0
75%
15W–5L · 60.3% of games
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
49 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer