← Search

Samantha Laubenstine

— year-end
197 matches · 120W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Samantha Laubenstine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
L
2026-06-07 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Zink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-10 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Sambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-07 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Nikolaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-16 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Nikolaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Lesley Agnew / Jody Wilson
2025-10-12 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Beth Apetrior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-28 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Sambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-14 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah McComas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-07 · RCW - Mowrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Sambrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Nikolaus championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-07-27 · #3 Doubles · with Kelly Beshore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-20 · RCW - Sambrick · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Zink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
91.7%
22W–2L · 70.2% of games
4.5
42.9%
18W–24L · 45% of games
7.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 68% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.1% of games
8.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 60.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.3% of games
9.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova