← Search

Angie Keyes

Brandon, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 26W–61L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angie Keyes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-09-09 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judy Gunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-26 · LeDuff, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judy Gunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
Amy Jones / Dorothy Graham
2026-08-20 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · LeDuff, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susan Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · Hughes, Anna · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jitendra Sahoo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Judy Gunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susan Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · Hughes, Anna · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hector Custode mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susan Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Candis Pizzetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
25%
4W–12L · 41.3% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 21.2% of games
3.5
40%
10W–15L · 48.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games
6.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 40.1% of games
7.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 45% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert