← Search

Lanessa Jenkins

— year-end
88 matches · 58W–30L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lanessa Jenkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Morales, Brittany · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tamara Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-27 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crystal Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Morales, Brittany · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tamara Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Morales, Brittany · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tamara Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jeana Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kari Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kari Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-19 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Temekia Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-16 · Barnes, Darryl · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellie Boutot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · Barnes, Darryl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-08 · Barnes, Darryl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iona Remulta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-01 · Barnes, Darryl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iona Remulta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.2% of games
3.0
72.9%
35W–13L · 60.8% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 45.4% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.7% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.8% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova