← Search

Deborah Rapoport

Teaneck, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 19W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Rapoport to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Volpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Volpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Volpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-01 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Saetre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-18 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Volpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-22 · Matchpoint Tennis Club: matchpoint sparks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Heimowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-05-19 · Matchpoint Tennis Club 65 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Riso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Remy Mendez / Jodi Mcgill
2025-03-26 · Matchpoint Sparks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Heimowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-18 · Matchpoint Sparks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yeonsoo Ohm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-12 · Matchpoint Sparks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Heimowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-02-12 · Matchpoint Sparks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Heimowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-29 · Matchpoint Sparks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Schlussel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 45.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova