← Search

George Scott

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 26W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add George Scott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-02-01 · THPRD-Young · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-01-16 · THPRD-Young · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kip Kaiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-03 · THPRD-Young · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-02 · THPRD-Bennett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-27 · THPRD-Bennett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ed de la Fuente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-09-13 · THPRD-Bennett · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
L
2025-03-08 · THPRD-Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Westrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-28 · THPRD-Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-31 · THPRD-Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-05 · THPRD-Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Hsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-12-08 · THPRD-Bennett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terrence Trausch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-22 · THPRD-Bennett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Norman Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2009–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 40.1% of games
3.5
11.1%
2W–16L · 33.2% of games
6.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 43% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 32% of games
6.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova