← Search

Barbara Forman

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 13W–20L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Barbara Forman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-08-06 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Geiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Leder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Geiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Geiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bev Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzann Gobis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzann Gobis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzann Gobis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Angerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-10 · #2 Doubles · with Christine McKinlay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.4% of games
7.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 64% of the time
#2 Doubles
64%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe