← Search

Deborah Clark

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 178W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Clark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history257 matches
L
2026-07-13 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Hauschildt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody Barbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anya Civitella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Vint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · DTP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Hitchcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · DTP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Berhman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · DTP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
W
2026-05-14 · DTP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Colliander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · DTP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Pesso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-03 · CP BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Lena Ursten Hobbs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-12 · CP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with AMY SITZE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.5% of games
3.0
65.5%
78W–41L · 57.1% of games
6.0
88.6%
39W–5L · 64.1% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.6% of games
6.0mixed
72.1%
31W–12L · 59.7% of games
6.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
50 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova