← Search

Jeff Crosten

Schwenksville, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 69W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Crosten to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Fuzzy Balls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Madson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
Kenneth West / Merrick Morris
2026-08-08 · Fuzzy Balls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Venneri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammed Nayeemulla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Chamberlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Reload and Fire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Fuzzy Balls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Dratch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Farnsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Ng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
David Miller / Onkar Singh
2026-05-16 · Reload and Fire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Rutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · Reload and Fire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlie Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Christopher Jones / Eric Voigt
2026-04-15 · Smashers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Rutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.6%
33W–9L · 61.6% of games
4.5
25%
3W–9L · 38.2% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 72.6% of games
8.0mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 56% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal