← Search

Charlie Choi

Villanova, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 78W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Charlie Choi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
Pat Brady / Kenneth West
2026-08-15 · Merion 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Halpern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · Logan 9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregg Frigerio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · Logan 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregg Frigerio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-2
W
2026-07-11 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammed Nayeemulla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Merion 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Coss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Merion 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Halpern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Naylors Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammed Nayeemulla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Naylors Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammed Nayeemulla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Rutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · Reload and Fire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Reload and Fire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Crosten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · Naylors Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mohammed Nayeemulla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
82.5%
33W–7L · 62.1% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 53.2% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
56.1%
32W–25L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer