← Search

Frances Howell

FRANKTOWN, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 22W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frances Howell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-09-03 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Cathy O'Neill / Nancy Harlow-Irwin
2026-07-29 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth McIntyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth McIntyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-08 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · GAC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · GAC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · GAC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · GAC PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · GAC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 46.4% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 48.1% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King