← Search

James Galenzoski

Rome, GA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 9W–3L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add James Galenzoski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Raja · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Quast · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · Quast · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · Quast · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-21 · CVTA/Todd Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · CVTA/Todd Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirk Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tommy Zaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Jeff Gilbert / Taylor Willingham
2024-02-27 · CVTA/Joseph Cheriyampurathu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Jeffrey Hart / Brian Stephens
2022-05-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Barnes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-04-26 · Cheriyampurathu · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Stoicoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.6% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova