← Search

Sandra Brand

Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 20W–45L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Sandra Brand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Salvadore Fuego · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · Blanchard (Ron Ehmann) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maira Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-23 · Valls NMB · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · Valls NMB · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Jimenez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Salvadore Fuego · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · Valls NMB · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · Salvadore Fuego · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isabella Ronchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-03-29 · Valls NMB · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-16 · Salvadore Fuego · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-26 · Salvadore Park (Pizziol) · #3 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Cristy Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-16 · Salvadore Fuego · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · Salvadore Park (Pizziol) · #5 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Pamela Waddell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.9% of games
4.5
29.5%
13W–31L · 42.8% of games
8.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#4 Female Doubles
9%
6 matches
#5 Female Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova