← Search

Natalia Moll

— year-end
247 matches · 165W–82L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Natalia Moll to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history247 matches
W
2026-09-02 · WestonHills/Garbine · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nikold Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · WestonHills/Garbine · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patricia Velez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-27 · Ltc/Sahar · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melisa Bayter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Ltc/Sahar · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marta Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Netflix at Ron Ehmann · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Fernanda Lesmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · WestonHills/Garbine · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with AYelen Gragg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · Netflix at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Fernanda Lesmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Michelle Castellanos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with AYelen Gragg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-07-11 · #4 Doubles · with Michelle Castellanos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Laura di Lauro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Piccolo/Colette · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andres Rodriguez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Teams61 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.5% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
71.3%
77W–31L · 60.3% of games
8.5
76.6%
36W–11L · 60.1% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.1% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
64 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer