← Search

Jacob Walker

Brooklyn, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 17W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jacob Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-04-21 · Sias · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · Sias · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nam Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-10 · Sias · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariel Schulman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-16 · Sias · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Swabb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-30 · Sias · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jules Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-12-02 · Sias · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krishan Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-11-10 · Sias · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Benjamin Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-15 · Sias · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nam Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-09-16 · Sias · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nam Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-07-23 · Bindler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-07-01 · Sias · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-06-24 · Sias · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nam Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 40.5% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe