← Search

Brendan O'Connor

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 21W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brendan O'Connor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-06-23 · Manhattan: Choy/Zhogov · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Manhattan: Choy/Zhogov · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arturo Benitez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · Manhattan: Choy/Zhogov · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · Choy/Montgomery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gaurav Chandra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-04 · Wong · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · Metro: Steadly/Salomon · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · Wong · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-04 · Choy/Montgomery · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Geoffrey Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-23 · Choy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-10-30 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-15 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Geoffrey Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-06 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 66.7% of games
4.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 63.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#1 Singles
19%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer