← Search

Beth Bryant

CANTON, GA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Beth Bryant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2026-06-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-13 · Woodmont - Schultz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annamarie Vasiloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Sandy Banet / Laura Baker
2024-07-23 · Woodmont - Schultz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Kim Miller / Jackie Noltkamper
2024-07-16 · Woodmont - Schultz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Barrineau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 4-6
W
2024-06-25 · Woodmont - Schultz · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Sophie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-06-18 · Woodmont - Schultz · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nola Kenney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Elizabeth Graves / Kim Beebe
2023-01-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Sophie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-12-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Sophie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Jenny Spain
2022-07-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Camp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Camp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer