← Search

Christopher Rogge

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 16W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christopher Rogge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-09-09 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · JMontague.7.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Lott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · KLaan-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Lindberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-02 · KLaan-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Straube mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Ryan Curet / Jordan Curet
2026-04-25 · JMontague-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Haine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · JMontague-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arash Chehrazi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-21 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Fye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Alex Sizemore / Cooper Norris
2026-03-14 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Edmunds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Edmunds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-30 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-24 · JMontague-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gerald Farren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-03 · JMontague-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 50% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 68.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#3 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert