← Search

Lauren Woodward

Davidson, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 141W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lauren Woodward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
W
2026-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Japec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · LJHI-Higgins/Bailey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Serena Igharas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · MCTA18/Pruski/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scarlett Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · MCTA18/Pruski/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Kinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Julie Moore / Ann Modlin
2026-07-27 · TLJCA-Cassarino/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Lenz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Lenz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-07 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Devon DeMaine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · TLJCA-Cassarino/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hallman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · TLJCA-Cassarino/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Lenz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
72.6%
82W–31L · 57.7% of games
4.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 57.8% of games
7.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 54.5% of games
8.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 58.5% of games
8.5
50%
5W–5L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
26 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert