← Search

Lori Fuller

— year-end
134 matches · 71W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lori Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-09-10 · LKDU-Dugan/Bailey 18+ 7.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzette Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-03 · LKDU-Dugan/Bailey 18+ 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Lesso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Marcavish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leta Wiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · LKDU-Dugan/Bailey 18+ 7.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaime Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leta Wiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cecil MacGregor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Mahler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · TLJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shumbriar Ostapko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · TLJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Mahler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
73.2%
41W–15L · 60.8% of games
4.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 46% of games
6.5
50%
8W–8L · 52.6% of games
7.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 49% of games
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams