← Search

Vicki Pound

— year-end
40 matches · 18W–22L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Vicki Pound to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-08 · Collins/PC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacie Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Place
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-20 · Collins-Schweitzer/PC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Garmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · Collins-Schweitzer/PC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ana Paula Schweitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-19 · Royal Oaks - Serve and Slay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · Royal Oaks - Serve and Slay · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Royal Oaks - Royal Hammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Pound mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · Royal Oaks - Serve and Slay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-15 · Royal Oaks - Serve and Slay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-07 · Royal Oaks - Serve and Slay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.5% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#1 Singles
13%
5 matches
#2 Singles
13%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal