← Search

Jill Reese

Boone, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 61W–62L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jill Reese to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Westphal/DV/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mandy Poplin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Julie Wilson
2026-08-20 · Reese/DV/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-08-19 · Westphal/DV/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Turbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · Reese/DV/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Reese/DV/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Miller-Reese/DV/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Gerbrands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · Reese/DV/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Miller-Reese/DV/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Shuford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · Miller-Reese/DV/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Gerbrands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · Henderson/DV/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · Henderson/DV/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · Steele/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Place
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.1% of games
3.5
56.5%
35W–27L · 51.6% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 39.4% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 47.6% of games
7.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Singles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams