← Search

Lindsey King

— year-end
50 matches · 36W–14L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Lindsey King to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gloria Yeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bailey McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · Bitsy Grant (Megan McPheely)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-28 · Bitsy Grant (Megan McPheely)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-17 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Stand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 6-4
L
2025-12-13 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelsey O'Regan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-22 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Vanetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-15 · Sandy Springs (Tracey Yang)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Swiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-04 · Bitsy Grant (Megan McPheely)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Mcpheely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-26 · Bitsy Grant (Megan McPheely)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alia Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams12 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
100%
5W–0L · 74.4% of games
4.5
62.9%
22W–13L · 52.1% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 69.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova