← Search

Jane Johnston

Dayton, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 15W–33L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Jane Johnston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2024-07-13 · QRRC Stapleton · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phyllis Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Pat Forster / Liz Smith
2024-06-08 · QRRC Stapleton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phyllis Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Sarah Richards / Susan Holm
2023-07-08 · BCC-Hayden · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-07-01 · BCC-Hayden · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-06-17 · BCC-Hayden · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeri Luce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-10 · BCC-Hayden · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-30 · WPAFB-Steinbrunner · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Litteral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-04-02 · WPAFB-Steinbrunner · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Litteral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-28 · WPAFB-Steinbrunner · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Polander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-14 · WPAFB Kurtz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-10-29 · WPAFB Kurtz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Hanf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-10-22 · WPAFB Kurtz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
25%
7W–21L · 40.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe