← Search

Shari Pol

— year-end
161 matches · 83W–78L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Shari Pol to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-09-03 · TOCC Kostal · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · TOCC Render-Leach - 40s · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Maisano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · TOCC Render-Leach - 40s · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Render-Leach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-04 · TOCC Render-Leach - 55s · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charlene Langlinais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-24 · Stanovich-Halstead · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Panter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Stanovich-Biloxi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Panter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-29 · Stanovich-Biloxi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Troutman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · TOCC Wrigley 3.5 18s · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Battaile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-14 · TOCC Wrigley 3.5 40s · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-13 · TOCC - Render-Leach 40s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · TOCC - Gordin/Langlinais · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Battaile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-02 · TOCC Wrigley 3.5 18s · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Dewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 58.8% of games
4.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 39.7% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.7% of games
7.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 44.7% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 61.1% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.4% of games
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal