← Search

Amanda Letonoff

Gulfport, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 78W–44L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amanda Letonoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · BBTC Austin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Mayfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · BBTC Austin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edye Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-31 · Denmark BBTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · BBTC-Descher · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daryle Bradley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · BBTC - Juraszek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Benigno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · BBTC-Descher · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Canon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Denmark BBTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Biloxi - Shoemake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Biloxi - Shoemake · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry P Calamari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · BBTC - Juraszek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Ladnier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · BBTC - Juraszek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Canon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.2%
30W–16L · 58.2% of games
7.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 64.4% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 54.1% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams