← Search

Kimberly Strachan

Birmingham, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
393 matches · 250W–143L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Strachan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history393 matches
L
2026-08-31 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Cracchiolo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Strachan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-10 · PINE-Snell 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Miles Uhlar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-04 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Strachan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · WESS-Palarz 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bart Feys mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Jennifer Godfrey / Mindy Gurn
2026-07-26 · #4 Doubles · with Agnieszka Palarz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · BRC-Endrud 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Nikole Carlson / Katarina Fisher
2026-07-07 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Iacco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Rayna Handelman / Prasath Balakrishnan
2026-06-27 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Strachan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.3% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
13W–0L · 78.2% of games
4.0
69.6%
117W–51L · 59.4% of games
4.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 30.4% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 71.9% of games
7.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.5% of games
8.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.3% of games
8.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 45.4% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
37%
10W–17L · 46.7% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
181 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
43 matches
#2 Singles
9%
35 matches
#3 Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe