← Search

Ritsuko Nakano

Oakland Twp, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
205 matches · 126W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ritsuko Nakano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #4 Doubles · with Carly Eckert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacey Lareau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laurie Blume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-13 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Lareau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dawn Clegg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · FAC-Keranen 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Lareau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Buechner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · FAC-Blume 55s 9.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christine Forester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alissa VanderKooi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carly Eckert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.5% of games
4.5
73%
81W–30L · 59.3% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.2% of games
9.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games
9.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
62 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert