← Search

Kenneth Gillespie

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 51W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kenneth Gillespie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
Steven Miller / John VanDeWater
2026-09-03 · Ar.Rubin65C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Kent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Ma.Osborn55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roger Hatlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-13 · Ar.Rubin65C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Winn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · Re.Procter65M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Ar.Rubin65C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Hamlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · Re.Procter65M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Procter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Re.Procter65M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Foster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-23 · La.Jansen65A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-09 · La.Jansen65A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-26 · La.Jansen65A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-19 · La.Jansen65A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-05 · La.Jansen65A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 52.6% of games
4.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 49.3% of games
7.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 47.7% of games
3.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49.8% of games
4.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.7% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 64.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal