← Search

Ken Nowell

Apex, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
358 matches · 211W–147L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ken Nowell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history358 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Ch.Brignac65C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Brignac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Jo.Diamond55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Jo.Diamond55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-13 · Ch.Brignac65C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Zatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Ch.Brignac65C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ray Goldberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · Je.Madia55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Daniel Knox / John VanDeWater
2026-07-28 · Da.Swann55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Lawton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Je.Madia55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · ACP.Madia · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · ACP.Madia · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Weygandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Da.Swann55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Lawton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · Je.Madia55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Weygandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60.6%
103W–67L · 56% of games
7.5
67.5%
54W–26L · 58.3% of games
8.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 49% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
125 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
104 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe