← Search

William Ritchey

— year-end
54 matches · 24W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add William Ritchey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-07-23 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-15 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Sesin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Romel Dy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-28 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · Strickler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Safeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Eichmiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Strickler · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Strickler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yancy Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-12 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Koo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-07 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · Strickler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · Sesin - Baseline Resistance · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
47.1%
16W–18L · 47.6% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 43.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#1 Singles
20%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova