← Search

Eric Price

HANOVER, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 22W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Eric Price to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jorge Paucar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Djajaputra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Vilk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Sybert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
John Batu / Peter Kim
2026-06-26 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Custer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Stickels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Vilk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · Atom Smashers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-15 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Djajaputra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Toro - Net Success 40+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ateeq Ahmed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · Hester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · Hester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karl Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 64.3% of games
3.5
23.1%
9W–30L · 36.1% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams