← Search

Jonathan Sanders

— year-end
97 matches · 56W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jonathan Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Nathan Belmore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Garland Kimmer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Sadie Campanella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Jannine Leshem / Jonathan Orenstein
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Belmore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Belmore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garland Kimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Ashley Anderson / David Freel
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · with Margaret Hart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · with Zoe Kelliher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garland Kimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
4.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 62.2% of games
9.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova