← Search

Kim Ripka

Englewood, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 98W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Ripka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
W
2026-08-25 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barb Hedges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-18 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · DPR-EP RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hervey Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · LTFC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · DPR-EP RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kendall Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Erica Bramlet / Aubrey Zahuranec
2026-08-04 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barb Hedges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Michelle Miller
2026-07-21 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Seaberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · DPR-EP RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hervey Pierre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · LTFC NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · LTFC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Seaberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
52.8%
76W–68L · 51.2% of games
9.0
0%
0W–7L · 34.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova