← Search

Anna Reed

Lone Tree, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 24W–44L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Anna Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-01 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Rodgers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patrick Reed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-18 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Deline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juliet Beckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patrick Reed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Seaberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patrick Reed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · GAC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Seaberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juliet Beckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Mease
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Mease
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-02 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loretta Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 52.2% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
25%
3W–9L · 41.9% of games
9.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova