← Search

Elizabeth Peyton

Zionsville, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 101W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Peyton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Mid Tri W CRC Lynch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Cox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
Shelby Ackerman / Meghan Slaninka
2026-08-09 · Mid Tri W CRC Lynch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Gudgel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A18 4.5W WHS Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · Indy A18 4.5W WHS Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Indy A18 4.5W WHS Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Indy 8.5W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erica Curtiss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Weitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
2025-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Duckworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Peggy Jones / Madelaine Jones
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dudash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.6% of games
4.0
84.8%
39W–7L · 64% of games
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.7% of games
7.5
73.5%
25W–9L · 60.9% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.7% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 58% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe