← Search

Jaclyn Swan

Boulder, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 12W–56L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jaclyn Swan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2025-05-08 · CVTA PINK · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan MacLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-01 · CVTA PINK · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jodi Ansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-13 · CVTA PINK · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mimi Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-06-11 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-06 · CVTA PINK · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mimi Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-28 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Gerra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-05-21 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-14 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-02 · CVTA PINK · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Geyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-08 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-01 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Burgener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-25 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Geyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.9% of games
3.5
10.3%
4W–35L · 31.8% of games
6.0
30%
6W–14L · 42% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer