← Search

Nancy Geyer

— year-end
63 matches · 14W–49L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Nancy Geyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2025-06-17 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-10 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2024-07-30 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Gerra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-25 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-06-13 · CVTA PINK · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-28 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-21 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Jasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-14 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Burgener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-07 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Jasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-05-02 · CVTA PINK · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jaclyn Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-01 · BTA-C TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-25 · BTA-C TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams14 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.6% of games
3.5
17.1%
7W–34L · 35.9% of games
6.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe