← Search

Stephanie Hanses

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 14W–99L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Hanses to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-12 · TOC.Allen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Murdock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-09 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Amy Rogers / Karen Merchant
2026-08-01 · TOC.Barcinas · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Ferralli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · TOC.Allen · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Ferralli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mahesh Salian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-2
L
2026-06-28 · TOC.Stutt · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Bereda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · TOC.Stutt · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with NEALE STUTT mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · TOC.Stutt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ivan Andjelkovic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mahesh Salian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-17 · TOC.Stutt · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with RUCHIR DHAR DWIVEDI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-11 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ferralli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · NMAC.Grasser · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ferralli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 39% of games
3.5
11.9%
7W–52L · 28.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 18.7% of games
6.5
7.7%
2W–24L · 29% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King