← Search

Mahesh Salian

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 66W–62L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mahesh Salian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-09-02 · TOC.Chaudhari · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-22 · TOC.Chaudhari · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with DEEPAK GAONKAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · ACP.Vaidya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Naramor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-31 · ACP.Vaidya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with RANDEEP BASU
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · ACP.Vaidya · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with RANDEEP BASU
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-22 · ACP.Vaidya · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with UTPAL JADIA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Hanses mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-2
W
2026-07-06 · ACP.Vaidya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kapil Dukle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · ACP.Vaidya · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with UTPAL JADIA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · ACP.Vaidya · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with RANDEEP BASU
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Jacobsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · TOC.Stutt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60.2%
53W–35L · 54.6% of games
4.0
5.9%
1W–16L · 33.3% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 51% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#1 Singles
12%
15 matches
#3 Singles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams