← Search

David Seaman

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 56W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Seaman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-07-18 · Smash & Dash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Keough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-16 · Smash & Dash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Smash & Dash · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Dansie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Smash & Dash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Smash & Dash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Smash & Dash · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Keough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-13 · SLTHC #1-Dansie/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · SLTHC #1-Dansie/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marco Pacheco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · SLTHC #1-Dansie/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-08 · SLTHC #1-Dansie/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · SLTC#1-Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Judice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · SLTC#1-Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
35.7%
15W–27L · 46.7% of games
3.5
34.4%
22W–42L · 42.6% of games
6.0
40%
6W–9L · 47.6% of games
7.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.2% of games
6.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal