Amy Sorrels
HUDSON, WI
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2025–2026
Captains: add Amy Sorrels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history13 matches
L
Ann Cadwallader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Helena Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Jacqueline Bettenga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Julie Bowles / Jennifer Jorgenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Barbara Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Katie Day / Erin Blacik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Michelle Finley / Barbara Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Isabella Taleon / Elizabeth Vanheest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Joanna Poinar / Somia Mourad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#2 Singles
15%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.